U.S Supreme Court To Hear Case Against FCC’S Profanity And Nudity Regulations

The U.S Supreme Court on Tuesday will weigh the govt’s power to regulate profanity and nudity on broadcast television in a challenge to a long-standing policy that dates back to 1978.

The networks’ challenge involved more recent events. One was a 2002 awards show during which singer Cher blurted out an expletive. Another was a 2003 show when actress Nicole Ritchie used two expletives. A third was a seven-second shot of a woman’s nude buttocks on a 2003 “NYPD Blue” episode on Walt Disney Co’s ABC that led to a $1.21 million in fines.

The Supreme Court will hear arguments on whether the FCC’s indecency policy should be struck down as unconstitutionally Vague and for Violating free-speech rights under the Constitution’s First Amendment.

Central to the case is the FCC’s right to regulate broadcast speech differently and more restrictly than other media in an effort to protect children from indecent contents, even brief nudity or a single expletive blurted out on a live show.

The Obama administration has defended the FCC’s policy as constitutional, arguing regulation of broadcast indecency does not violate the First Amendment is needed and should be upheld.

One thought on “U.S Supreme Court To Hear Case Against FCC’S Profanity And Nudity Regulations

Add yours

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Up ↑

Sunshine and Cyra

Let me share with you the love that I've experienced.

TIME

Current & Breaking News | National & World Updates

thejumbledmind

Some political ramblings...and other jumbledness

%d bloggers like this: